<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Left Justified &#187; browsers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leftjustified.net/topic/browsers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leftjustified.net</link>
	<description>In a few words, explain what this weblog is about.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:10:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Gecko 1.8: Bye-bye printed float bug!</title>
		<link>http://leftjustified.net/journal/2005/03/29/gecko-18-bye-bye-printed-float-bug/</link>
		<comments>http://leftjustified.net/journal/2005/03/29/gecko-18-bye-bye-printed-float-bug/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 00:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftjustified.net/journal/2005/03/29/gecko-18-bye-bye-printed-float-bug/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From  Gecko 1.8 For Web Developers: Columns (via: Anne):

 In particular some huge issues involving floats breaking across columns have been fixed. Since we use the same code for page layout as for columns, this also means a lot of problems with printing (and print previewing) pages with floats have been fixed

Hopefully this means [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roc/archives/2005/03/gecko_18_for_we.html"> Gecko 1.8 For Web Developers: Columns</a> (via: <a href="http://annevankesteren.nl/" title="Anne VanKesteren">Anne</a>):</p>
<blockquote cite="http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roc/archives/2005/03/gecko_18_for_we.html">
<p> In particular some huge issues involving floats breaking across columns have been fixed. Since we use the same code for page layout as for columns, this also means a lot of problems with printing (and print previewing) pages with floats have been fixed</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Hopefully this means that floated elements (read: columns) will be continued on the next page, as they should, instead of disappearing into some kind of magical void.</p>
<p>The article referenced above contains some very interesting CSS news regarding columns &mdash;  go check it out! It looks like Firefox 1.1 is really going to up the stakes in the CSS 2.1 compliance field. Opera and Mozilla are certainly the driving forces at the moment, though I don&#8217;t doubt the Safari team are working hard to stay in the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://leftjustified.net/journal/2005/03/29/gecko-18-bye-bye-printed-float-bug/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Acid Test Challenge</title>
		<link>http://leftjustified.net/journal/2005/03/17/acid-test/</link>
		<comments>http://leftjustified.net/journal/2005/03/17/acid-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 04:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftjustified.net/journal/2005/03/17/acid-test/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By now you&#8217;ve probably read this elsewhere --- <a href="http://news.com.com/The+Acid2+challenge+to+Microsoft/2010-1032_3-5618723.html?tag=nefd.ac">Opera have challenged MS</a> to a CSS comformance duel. The old acid test was first passed by IE mac, yet somehow I have my doubts that IE will take the title this time &#8216;round.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To contribute to the challenge, I&#8217;ve thrown together a quick <a href="http://leftjustified.net/posts/acidtest/test.xhtml" title="my acid test">acid test of my own</a>, one which combines a few challenges for IE; including</p>
<ul>
<li>Fixed positioning (elements and backgrounds)</li>
<li>24-bit PNG</li>
<li>Sizing/positioning an element using <code>left:; right:; top:; bottom:;</code></li>
<li>Styling of the html element (which IE6 already does&#8230; sort of <img src='http://leftjustified.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</li>
<li>XHTML 1.1 served with its correct mime-type (insert evil laugh here!)</li>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;m very tempted to make up a second acid test based solely around the multitude of bugs associated with IE&#8217;s <code>hasLayout</code> property, but really, what&#8217;s the point? <img src='http://leftjustified.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif' alt=':-|' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://leftjustified.net/journal/2005/03/17/acid-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No More Suspect Traffic</title>
		<link>http://leftjustified.net/journal/2005/01/30/suspect-traffic/</link>
		<comments>http://leftjustified.net/journal/2005/01/30/suspect-traffic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2005 03:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftjustified.net/journal/2005/01/30/suspect-traffic/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having just cleansed this site of ten of the vilest pieces of comment spam I've ever seen, I'm fed up.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m fed up with the entire cornucopia of suspect tinned meat products that float amongst the web. I leave comments open on all my old posts to encourage further discussion in the future; whether this will remain is in serious jeopardy. While there are many effective ways of lessening comment spam, referrer spam is another beast entirely &#8212; an insidious, pointless resource hog that baffles me by its mere existence. Do they really think <q>webmasters</q> are going to buy SEO tools from spammers?</p>
<p>As a result, I have added some severe <code>ReWrite</code> rules to <code>.htaccess</code> in an attempt to stem the tides. I&#8217;ve blocked anything remotely suspicious, including all <code>localhost</code> IP&#8217;s (my log files reveal someone is developing locally using one of my CSS files&#8230; you idiot); any odd referrers that reside behind <code>403 Authorization</code> or are &#8216;vacant&#8217; but return suspicious <i>whois</i> queries. </p>
<p>One tool that I found very useful whilst testing these changes is <a href="http://www.wannabrowser.com/index.html" title="http user agent spoofing">wannaBrowser</a>, which fakes HTTP user agent strings and referrers.</p>
<p>If I have any reason to believe that I&#8217;m blocking legitimate users with these measures I will change the redirection to a page that allows you to contact me and say that you feel hard done by. Otherwise I&#8217;ll just leave them in limbo and not waste another precious kilobyte on all this suspect traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://leftjustified.net/journal/2005/01/30/suspect-traffic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Listens; But to Whom?</title>
		<link>http://leftjustified.net/journal/2004/11/12/ms-listens/</link>
		<comments>http://leftjustified.net/journal/2004/11/12/ms-listens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2004 06:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftjustified.net/journal/2004/11/12/ms-listens/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From an interview with Steve Vamos, Microsoft Australia&#8217;s managing director:

I don&#8217;t believe it is a true statement that IE doesn&#8217;t have the features that our customers want. We take user feedback very seriously. If you have that feedback, then you should feed it back to us because we will feed it to the product team.

Hmmm, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From an <a href="http://news.com.com/Microsoft+says+Firefox+not+a+threat+to+IE/2100-1032_3-5448719.html" title="CNET Article: MS says Firefox not a threat">interview</a> with Steve Vamos, Microsoft Australia&#8217;s managing director:</p>
<blockquote><p>
I don&#8217;t believe it is a true statement that IE doesn&#8217;t have the features that our customers want. We take user feedback very seriously. If you have that feedback, then you should feed it back to us because we will feed it to the product team.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Hmmm, I thought <a href="http://radio.weblogs.com/0001011/2004/01/14.html#a6186" title="Scoble: IE conversation is great">we</a> <a href="http://www.petitiononline.com/msiepng/petition.html" title="PNG Support for IE - Petition">already</a> <a href="http://channel9.msdn.com/" title="MSDN Developer forums">had</a>. The interview contains some hilarious quotes, especially this one:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>There are plenty of products out there with features we don&#8217;t have. We have plenty of features that our customers don&#8217;t use.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Sounds like a winning combo to me.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2004/11/09/254596.aspx" title="IE Blog: Why I Like Windows">this fine piece of marketing</a> from the IE team. Wow, it&#8217;s just like watching Fox news during the US election &#8212; fair and unbiased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://leftjustified.net/journal/2004/11/12/ms-listens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

